guide
How to document decisions in a practical project
Build a useful design or performance log with criteria, evidence, revision and an original comparison example.
Write a criterion you can check
Begin with the task brief and choose an observable criterion. In a design project this might concern stability or legibility; in a performance it might concern clarity of delivery or timing. Record the relevant requirement in your own words and explain what evidence would show progress. This log is an editorial planning tool, not a substitute for your school’s assessment documentation.
Compare alternatives fairly
For an original design example, compare two cardboard phone-stand prototypes using the same phone and surface. One folds flat but tips when the screen is touched. The other remains upright but takes more space. Record both findings before choosing a version. A photograph of the final object alone would not explain the trade-off or show why your choice changed.
Make each revision traceable
A useful entry says what you observed, what you changed and what happened on the next trial. For the phone stand, widening the base might address tipping. Test again under the same conditions before claiming an improvement. For a performance, record a short rehearsal segment, choose one aspect to change and compare the revised segment against the same criterion.
Prepare a concise reflection
Describe one successful decision and one unresolved limitation using evidence from the log. Avoid claims such as the project was perfect or everyone preferred it unless you have appropriate evidence. Keep versions, dates and relevant feedback together. Follow your school’s rules for documenting assistance, collaboration and use of digital tools, and obtain permission before sharing recordings involving other people.
Find resources for your next attempt
- Explore study discussions on ATARMAXXING
Ask a focused process question and explain what you have already tried. Keep private recordings and identifying information out of public posts.
Continue with a related guide
Methodology
Original editorial guidance and illustrative examples prepared on 4 November 2026. These exercises are not official assessment questions and do not specify syllabus requirements.